<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ronald de Kock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rdekock.nl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rdekock.nl</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 06:13:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Live migration not working when disabling IPv6 on Hyper-V host</title>
		<link>http://www.rdekock.nl/live-migration-not-working-when-disabling-ipv6-on-hyper-v-host/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rdekock.nl/live-migration-not-working-when-disabling-ipv6-on-hyper-v-host/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 17:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronald de Kock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HYPER-V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPv6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Live migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCVMM2008R2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rdekock.nl/?p=111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week I was implementing a Hyper-V two node cluster with iSCSI storage. It was my first cluster with iSCSI instead of Fibre Channel storage. I Used the cluster validation tool and the result was OK. Things looked good. When I started testing the Live migration feature, it did not work ! I could do a quick migration [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week I was implementing a Hyper-V two node cluster with iSCSI storage. It was my first cluster with iSCSI instead of Fibre Channel storage. I Used the cluster validation tool and the result was OK. Things looked good. When I started testing the Live migration feature, it did not work ! I could do a quick migration but not live migration. SCVMM gave me the following message:</p>
<p>Error (10698)<br />
Virtual Machine TEST could not be live migrated to virtual machine host HYPERV01 using this cluster configuration.<br />
(unspecified error (0&#215;80004005))</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-112" title="livemigration" src="http://www.rdekock.nl/wp-uploads/2010/05/livemigration.jpg" alt="" width="720" height="143" /></p>
<p>I will not bother you with the troubleshooting steps taken, but after enabling IPv6 on the NIC&#8217;s of the HYPER-V hosts used for managing the host, live migration worked fine.<br />
So yet another reason why you should not disable IPv6 !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rdekock.nl/live-migration-not-working-when-disabling-ipv6-on-hyper-v-host/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Upgrading Windows Server 2000 to Server 2003 forestprep error</title>
		<link>http://www.rdekock.nl/upgrading-windows-server-2000-to-server-2003-forestprep-error/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rdekock.nl/upgrading-windows-server-2000-to-server-2003-forestprep-error/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 10:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronald de Kock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2003]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forestprep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preferredlanguage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rdekock.nl/?p=108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was working on an upgrade of a Windows Server 2000 Active Directory to Windows Server 2003 and encountered a problem when upgrade the schema version. After all preparations were taken I ran the adprep /forestprep command and got the following output: ============================================================================= &#8220;attributeId&#8221; attribute value for objects defined in Windows 2000 schema and extended schema [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was working on an upgrade of a Windows Server 2000 Active Directory to Windows Server 2003 and encountered a problem when upgrade the schema version. After all preparations were taken I ran the adprep /forestprep command and got the following output:</p>
<p>=============================================================================<br />
&#8220;attributeId&#8221; attribute value for objects defined in Windows 2000 schema and extended schema do not match.</p>
<p>A previous schema extension has defined the attribute value as &#8220;1.2.840.114050.1.1.1.1.90&#8243; for object &#8220;CN=preferredLanguage,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=Contoso,DC=com&#8221; differently than the schema extension needed for Windows 2003 server .<br />
[Status/Consequence]<br />
Adprep cannot extend your existing schema<br />
[User Action]<br />
Contact the vendor of the application that previously extended the schema to resolve the inconsistency. Then run adprep again.</p>
<p> =============================================================================<br />
&#8220;isSingleValued&#8221; attribute value for objects defined in Windows 2000 schema and extended schema do not match.</p>
<p>A previous schema extension has defined the attribute value as &#8220;FALSE&#8221; for object &#8220;CN=preferredLanguage,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=contoso,DC=com&#8221; differently than the schema extension needed for Windows 2003 server .<br />
[Status/Consequence]<br />
Adprep cannot extend your existing schema<br />
[User Action]<br />
Contact the vendor of the application that previously extended the schema to resolve the inconsistency. Then run adprep again.</p>
<p>==============================================================================</p>
<p>I opened up a PSS Support call because I am always carefull with schema issues. Better be safe than sorry. Microsoft suggested to run the renameattribute.exe included in the hotfix explained in <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/293783">KB293783</a>.  The KB is referring to &#8221; Unix services for windows&#8221;  which caused the problem. The renameattribute did not solve the problem.</p>
<p>After a talk with the sysadmin that was working with the company the longest, he remembered that years ago there was an issue when the COGNOS application was implemented. He remembered that they did an schema extension on the AD. Because there were a lot of problems with the AD integration, the AD integration was cancelled.</p>
<p>The Attribute PreferredLanguage was implemeted by COGNOS with the wrong OID. After checking the AD that the attribute was not used by any user object, I renamed the ldapdisplayname, admindisplayname and the RDN of the attribute preferredlanguage to COGNOSpreferredlanguage. After the change the forestprep worked without any errors!</p>
<p>I have been using the<a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/nl-nl/sysinternals/bb963907(en-us).aspx"> ADExplorer </a>tool from sysinternals and I liked it very much. It is way better than working with ldp.exe from MS.</p>
<p>Please be very carefull when making changes to the Active Directory Schema ! Making changes in the schema is always at your own risk !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rdekock.nl/upgrading-windows-server-2000-to-server-2003-forestprep-error/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ServicePrincipalName (SPN) and SQL 2008 Failover Cluster</title>
		<link>http://www.rdekock.nl/serviceprincipalname-spn-and-sql-2008-failover-cluster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rdekock.nl/serviceprincipalname-spn-and-sql-2008-failover-cluster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronald de Kock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SQL Server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rdekock.nl/?p=98</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When installing a SQL 2008 Server Failover Cluster it is necessary to create SPN&#8217;s for the SQL Server Service Account. One way to accomplish this is to tweak the Service User Account used for running the SQL Server. The permissions of the Service Account can to be adjusted to allow it to create and remove SPN&#8217;s. Use [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When installing a SQL 2008 Server Failover Cluster it is necessary to create SPN&#8217;s for the SQL Server Service Account. One way to accomplish this is to tweak the Service User Account used for running the SQL Server. The permissions of the Service Account can to be adjusted to allow it to create and remove SPN&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Use ADSI Edit (included in Server 2008) and connect to the Default Naming Context.<br />
Locate the Service Account, open the security tab.<br />
Select SELF in the group or user names windows and check the Allow box for  &#8221;Write public information&#8221; .</p>
<div id="attachment_101" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 281px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-101" title="SQL_permission_service_account" src="http://www.rdekock.nl/wp-uploads/2010/03/SQL_permission_service_account-271x300.jpg" alt="SELF permissions" width="271" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">SELF permissions</p></div>
<p>After making the change restart the SQL Server service. The Service Account will register the SPN automatically.</p>
<p>To check if the SPN&#8217;s are registered correctly open a command prompt and do:<br />
setspn -L Serviceaccount (e.g. SA_SQL2008_01)</p>
<p>The output should look like:<br />
Registered ServicePrincipal Names for CN=SA_SQL2008_01, OU=Service Accounts, DC=Contoso, DC=com</p>
<p>MSSQLSvc/FQDN:1433</p>
<p>Works like a charm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rdekock.nl/serviceprincipalname-spn-and-sql-2008-failover-cluster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>KMS (Key Management Service) and AD domain membership</title>
		<link>http://www.rdekock.nl/kms-key-management-service-and-ad-domain-membership/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rdekock.nl/kms-key-management-service-and-ad-domain-membership/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronald de Kock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server 2008 R2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rdekock.nl/?p=94</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am working on several Windows 7 deployment projects where a KMS server needs to be implemented. During design phase the question rose whether there was a need for Active Directory and/or domain membership for KMS to activate the Windows 7 clients. One of the customers did not want the workstations to be a member of an Active [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am working on several Windows 7 deployment projects where a KMS server needs to be implemented. During design phase the question rose whether there was a need for Active Directory and/or domain membership for KMS to activate the Windows 7 clients. One of the customers did not want the workstations to be a member of an Active Directory domain. So I have done some tests in my Testlab and found that the KMS server will activate any client with a GVLK product key installed as long as it can communicate with the KMS Server on port TCP 1688. There is no need for domain membership whatsoever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rdekock.nl/kms-key-management-service-and-ad-domain-membership/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting rid of the RDS Single Sign on security warning.</title>
		<link>http://www.rdekock.nl/getting-rid-of-the-rds-single-sign-on-security-warning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rdekock.nl/getting-rid-of-the-rds-single-sign-on-security-warning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronald de Kock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Remote Desktop Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server 2008 R2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rdekock.nl/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been playing with the Windows Server 2008 R2 Remote Desktop Services (formerly Terminal Services) and ran into a problem with a security warning popping up when clicking a signed rdp file in the RD Web Access interface. I have set up the following environment:   To be able to use the Single Sign [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been playing with the Windows Server 2008 R2 Remote Desktop Services (formerly Terminal Services) and ran into a problem with a security warning popping up when clicking a signed rdp file in the RD Web Access interface. I have set up the following environment:</p>
<p> <img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-80" title="rds_nevironment" src="http://www.rdekock.nl/wp-uploads/2009/11/rds_nevironment.JPG" alt="rds_nevironment" width="501" height="118" /></p>
<p>To be able to use the Single Sign On feature which is included in the RD Web Access you need to sign your RemoteApp&#8217;s with a certificate. How you can set this up is explained in an article on the <a title="SSO on RDS explanation" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rds/archive/2009/08/11/introducing-web-single-sign-on-for-remoteapp-and-desktop-connections.aspx" target="_blank">Microsoft RDS Team Blog</a>.</p>
<p>After implemting the RemoteApp signing you&#8217;re not quite finished. The following happens: Every time a user clicks on one of the RemoteApp a security warning comes up which states: A Website wants to run a RemoteApp program. Make sure that you trust the publisher before you connect to run the program.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-85" title="rds_security_warning_nocheckbox" src="http://www.rdekock.nl/wp-uploads/2009/11/rds_security_warning_nocheckbox-300x177.jpg" alt="rds_security_warning_nocheckbox" width="300" height="177" /></p>
<p> Of course this is very annoying and we want this security warning to disappear. There are two ways to do this.</p>
<p><strong>1. Changing logon settings.</strong></p>
<p>When you log on to the RD Web Access web page you can choose whether you are on a public or on a private computer.</p>
<p><img class="size-medium wp-image-68 alignnone" title="rds_login_private" src="http://www.rdekock.nl/wp-uploads/2009/11/rds_login_private-300x165.jpg" alt="rds_login_private" width="300" height="165" /></p>
<p><img class="size-full wp-image-84 alignnone" title="rds_security_warning" src="http://www.rdekock.nl/wp-uploads/2009/11/rds_security_warning1.JPG" alt="rds_security_warning" width="270" height="179" /></p>
<p> If you change the radio button to Private computer before you logon to the RD Web Access web page the security warning still comes up, but you will see a checkbox you can enable to never warn you again for this and the pop-up will dissapear the next time you will click the RemoteApp.</p>
<p><strong> </strong><strong>2. Create a GPO with .rdp signing settings</strong></p>
<p>You can also create a GPO with the follwing settings:</p>
<p>{Computer | User}\Policies\Administrative Templates\Windows Components\Remote Desktop Services\Remote Desktop Connection Client</p>
<p>&#8220;Specify SHA1 thumprint of certificates representing trusted .rdp publishers&#8221;  and enter the SHA1 thumprint of the certificate you use for signing your RemoteApp&#8217;s.</p>
<p><img class="size-medium wp-image-69 alignnone" title="sha1_policy" src="http://www.rdekock.nl/wp-uploads/2009/11/sha1_policy-300x273.jpg" alt="sha1_policy" width="300" height="273" /></p>
<p>You can find the SHA1 thunmprint on the details tab when you open the certificate.</p>
<p><img class="size-medium wp-image-70 alignnone" title="certificate_sha1_trumbprint" src="http://www.rdekock.nl/wp-uploads/2009/11/certificate_sha1_trumbprint-300x246.jpg" alt="certificate_sha1_trumbprint" width="300" height="246" /></p>
<p> When you use this second option your users do not need to change the logon radio button whether they are on a private or public computer.</p>
<p>I have had some discussion with the guys @ Microsoft from the RDS Team. They came up with the what I call workaround. Because it seems that there are no real solutions available at the moment because the behaviour is &#8220;By Design&#8221;. Microsoft promised to get back to me when they find a better option to solve this issue because the workaround does not work for users who are working on non-domain joined workstations where we cannot apply GPO&#8217;s. Users on non-domain joined computers will always get the security warning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rdekock.nl/getting-rid-of-the-rds-single-sign-on-security-warning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forefront UAG (Unified Access Gateway)</title>
		<link>http://www.rdekock.nl/forefront-uag-unified-access-gateway/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rdekock.nl/forefront-uag-unified-access-gateway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronald de Kock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechEd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rdekock.nl/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I have attended a session @Tech-ed Berlin where the product Forefront Unified Access Gateway has been presented. Although the product is currently still in Beta. The Senior Product Manager told us that the RTM will be available before end of 2009. The product is the follow up from IAG 2007 (Intelligent Application Gateway).However UAG [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I have attended a session @Tech-ed Berlin where the product Forefront Unified Access Gateway has been presented. Although the product is currently still in Beta. The Senior Product Manager told us that the RTM will be available before end of 2009. The product is the follow up from IAG 2007 (Intelligent Application Gateway).However UAG includes the follow up from ISA known as the Forefront Threat Management Gateway and it includes Microsoft DirectAccess which is a HOT product with high potential. Microsoft is promoting its any4vision. Access for any employee, business partner or customer from anyplace, anywhere from any device. A step forward that should eliminate the entire microsoft product thinking. Microsoft finally understands that it needs to supply acces form other platforms into their servers. Shortly after the Tech-Ed I will evaluate the Beta of UAG and you will find some interesting posts on my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rdekock.nl/forefront-uag-unified-access-gateway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Teched Berlin 2009 entrance card received !</title>
		<link>http://www.rdekock.nl/teched-berlin-2009-entrance-card-received/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rdekock.nl/teched-berlin-2009-entrance-card-received/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronald de Kock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TechEd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rdekock.nl/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I received my final confirmation for the Microsoft Teched Berlin. 11 more days to go&#8230; Of course I will publish my Agenda of this Blog when it is ready. I am planning on placing a lot of the information I receive on Teched onto this website. So be prepared for a load of information after [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I received my final confirmation for the Microsoft Teched Berlin. 11 more days to go&#8230;</p>
<p>Of course I will publish my Agenda of this Blog when it is ready. I am planning on placing a lot of the information I receive on Teched onto this website. So be prepared for a load of information after 13 November when I will be back in the Netherlands !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rdekock.nl/teched-berlin-2009-entrance-card-received/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hello World</title>
		<link>http://www.rdekock.nl/hello-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rdekock.nl/hello-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronald de Kock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Others]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rdekock.nl/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally my blog is up and running. I am personally entering a new decennium (just turned 30) and I thought it would be nice to share my experiences and knowledge to the community. So sit back and enjoy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally my blog is up and running. I am personally entering a new decennium (just turned 30) and I thought it would be nice to share my experiences and knowledge to the community. So sit back and enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rdekock.nl/hello-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
